This mini-post is part of a series about good testing practices, which I also presented at a couple of conferences. Here it is in PyCon US 2023 One testing problem that doesn’t get enough attention in my opinion is tests that don’t have locality of behavior. By that I mean cases where a test is broken down into different parts in a way that makes understanding more difficult. This is important in every type of code, and tests are no exception. ...
This mini-post is part of a series about good testing practices, which I also presented at a couple of conferences. Here it is in PyCon US 2023 Writing tests that are not isolated is a sure way to create unnecessary work for ourselves. By “tests that are not isolated”, I mean tests that sometimes have a different outcome (failing / passing) if we run only a subset of them, if we run them in a different order or if we run them in parallel. ...
This mini-post is part of a series about good testing practices, which I also presented at a couple of conferences. Here it is in PyCon US 2023 Sometimes our tests lie to us. We have a test that was supposed to protect us from some bug, but that bug happened after all. Of course, what happened was that we made a mistake, and the test didn’t really verify what we thought it does. ...
This mini-post is part of a series about good testing practices, which I also presented at a couple of conferences. Here it is in PyCon US 2023 This is a “warm-up footgun” to the blog post series. The easiest way to shoot yourself in the foot, testing-wise, is to have no tests at all. In my experience, writing any tests often helps us - even if these tests are not well-written, and even if they’re just a drop in the sea. ...